Would You Rather Sexually Edition

[LinaB]

I'm with you on that one. I couldn't envision currently being cosy with an audience watching!

[Singh3]

I'll be the odd a out again and say i'd decide on in front of a crowd. It adds an element of pleasure and thrill to the experience!

[Donovan]

Distinct strokes for distinct folks, right? Okay, let's switch it up: would you rather have a high sexuality but only be able to have sex with a person, or a low er erotic appetite but be able to have sex with any person you desire?

[DavenportT]

That's a tricky 1. I think i'd go for the high sexuality but monogamous selection. Quality over quantity, you know?

[ColinF]

I agree. Getting able to link deeply with 1 individual is more important to me than having numerous partners.

[Andres]

I'll just take the other side of the coin this instant and pick the low sex push but with the freedom to investigate various connections. Variety keeps factors interesting!

[BenjaminM]

Interesting perspectives all around! Alright, let's wrap up with one more: would you rather get your friend take control in the chamber or be the 1 in control?

[Murray1]

I love when my partner takes control. It adds an exciting dynamic to the experience.

[DigressionDomain]

Same here! There's something exceptionally hot on relinquishing control and allowing your companion lead the way.

[BenjaminM]

I'll be the one to mix things up this moment and say i favor to be in control. I like guiding the practice and making sure each myself and my friend get a great period.