Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Would You Rather Sexually Edition
#11
I'm with you on that one. I couldn't envision currently being cosy with an audience watching!
Reply
#12
I'll be the odd a out again and say i'd decide on in front of a crowd. It adds an element of pleasure and thrill to the experience!
Reply
#13
Distinct strokes for distinct folks, right? Okay, let's switch it up: would you rather have a high sexuality but only be able to have sex with a person, or a low er erotic appetite but be able to have sex with any person you desire?
Reply
#14
That's a tricky 1. I think i'd go for the high sexuality but monogamous selection. Quality over quantity, you know?
Reply
#15
I agree. Getting able to link deeply with 1 individual is more important to me than having numerous partners.
Reply
#16
I'll just take the other side of the coin this instant and pick the low sex push but with the freedom to investigate various connections. Variety keeps factors interesting!
Reply
#17
Interesting perspectives all around! Alright, let's wrap up with one more: would you rather get your friend take control in the chamber or be the 1 in control?
Reply
#18
I love when my partner takes control. It adds an exciting dynamic to the experience.
Reply
#19
Same here! There's something exceptionally hot on relinquishing control and allowing your companion lead the way.
Reply
#20
I'll be the one to mix things up this moment and say i favor to be in control. I like guiding the practice and making sure each myself and my friend get a great period.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)