12-07-2024, 05:23 AM
Nutshell version:
My protest is about I may not be a “messenger/angel (sent from) of God/The Great Beyond” or a religious member of Jesus, but people need to stop being nazis towards the female human that’s… you know… “BLESSED (UPSTAIRS)”! This is how we were created - regardless of what belief we believe in and we need to learn to appreciate the appearance of each other regardless of race… and age! In other words, people need to learn to stop body shaming the female human body - regardless of their race… AND age! I'm trying to protest "female liberation rights"! - Only to be shunned for "spam" - even though I posted on their domain only once! I'm just trying to do what any good activist would do: stand up and take charge for that said individual or group that's being treated wrongly! Ask anyone! I never thought I would ask this, but... is... you know... standing up, taking charge, going on strike (to protest unacceptable work conditions) for a group's rights considered some kind of SIN in this case?
Summary version:
It all began when I first stumbled upon Inside Edition’s videos of women - that’s WOMEN getting slammed, insulted, and blasted for “showing too much of their body”. Then it escalates further when they show a school is photoshopping out women’s cleavages to make them look “modest” for their yearbook. I feel this type of treatment towards the female human is all wrong! Like, can’t anybody learn to appreciate and look at the female body without censoring it in any way? Can’t you let ANYBODY get a chance to learn about the differences between the male and female human bodies????
THEN… and ONLY then... comes along… you guessed it. That one video Inside Edition publishes. And after seeing her top blurred, my inner voice in my head yelled out: “That’s the last straw!” Like, can’t some of us get a chance to learn something new that just aroused our curiosity? Such as how the human body changes with time in terms of both genders? Like, now, I can finally visualize myself (my whole body) from little boy to fully grown man. But when Inside Edition published that footage, the new question that took me by storm is: what would a female look like from a little girl to a fully grown woman? At least this type of footage can give me a better visual illustration - provided that Inside Edition didn’t blur it in the first place. And this will give the kids a jump start lesson on why boys and girls exist in the first place - not only because of their mental traits from toy stores, but also for a later life stage.
This is how the sequence of events played out in chronological order.
But with YouTube’s broken comment system GHOSTING certain-to-random comments, even on my backup YouTube account from my separate backup email address, I can’t seem to get ANY messages across! AKA, "shadowbanning" me.
Speaking of which, when I tried to post this on r/Feminism and r/AskFeminists, they BOTH perma-banned me for NO REASON and muted me from talking to their mods for 28 days!
Why do I say “no reason”?
"Hello, You have been permanently banned from participating in this subreddit because you/your post/action/comment broke/violated the community’s rules. You won’t be able to post or comment, but you can still view and subscribe to it.
If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team by replying to this message.
Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole."
WHAT rule(s)?! As you can see, there is no specific reason or rule listed in the message above (that was broken). So this is why I claim or what I mean by "banned from a sub for ‘no reason’. - Even for something that was never officially listed on that sub’s rule board.
Once more, I, along with these parents of their own daughter proved one major point: if a male can go topless/show their body, then so can a female - regardless of age!
Can’t I get a chance to learn something new? Some evolution/development processes for certain things can be a little more complicated than you originally first thought. Plus, I don’t recall learning about the development of the human body in terms of both genders in any of my past biology classes!
In the videos I watched, those women involved in those videos - the victims, they were doing nothing wrong! They were just minding their own business. Then, out of the blue, some random person(s) demands they “cover up” (to “protect the kids”).
When I comment “Can’t these guys learn to appreciate one’s female appearance?”, it gets ghosted by YouTube’s blasted comment moderating system. That just fuels my rage as due to that combined with getting (permanently) banned from subreddits makes me feel this world is getting more and more paranoid. I’ve never felt so shunned from the internet in all my life! I can’t seem to get any messages across at this rate!
And after that one video Inside Edition posted, I felt there might be more visual content like this out here somewhere. I just have to get lucky I find it first. Then, out of a random thought - after viewing the napalm article on Wikipedia, “Napalm Girl” was the next subject that took me by storm. And sure enough, there was the picture of her unedited - on one site, and another - from another site with her chest blurred. That got me into setting this female nudity rights protest into motion.
And while dumping some trash in a dumpster one day, I found a discarded disposable diaper box by the outside right side of the dumpster and noticed that there was a topless little girl plastered onto it. That was just the evidence I need to show everyone that the censorship regulations involving the female human body are inconsistent. That, along with nude statues - artwork of naked people.
They blast a living person, but not a statue or a disposable diaper box! - Or even something that’s news media approved!
The thing is: Inside Edition continues to upload more and more new videos about these types of incidents as each day passes! And I couldn’t see anyone else speaking out about/against this type of treatment - most likely due to the flawed YouTube comment mod system.
So seeing I’m the only one who cares for these individuals (which includes Napalm Girl (note: some images are censored while others are not)) - at this degree, I might as well do something about it - in a more drastic fashion (because of the ghosting)! (Somebody’s gotta do it!) Because like Duck (Montague) and Percy from Duck Takes Charge and Orange from Number 3 of getting out of doing one’s homework: STAND UP (TOWARDS THIS NONSENSE)! - Like going on strike due to poor work qualities/requirements. TAKE CHARGE! Don’t let this type of treatment continue! Put a stop to it somehow - one way or another!
Fellow females, for too long, you have all been body-shamed by these numbskulls who think they know everything about the female body! The time is now! Rise up, my fellow female friends! RISE UP! Viva la revolution!
Long detailed version:
Ok, before you start reading below, I want you to visit this and read the whole article to better understand my situation: CLICK HERE.
I got banned from Lemmy social site servers for “CSAM” all because of this: the Napalm Girl pic and another thing I saw on Inside Edition’s channel in addition to some nude statues - literally artwork of naked people - all because I was trying to protest the inconsistencies of censorship towards the female human - regardless of their race AND age!
Let me be clear on one thing: I didn’t post any “CSAM” on the Lemmy servers! I’m protesting something that I feel is unfair towards the female human.
Please actually watch these before jumping to conclusions so you can actually understand what I’m really protesting!
Women Who Were Told Their Outfits Were ‘Too Revealing’
Mom Says She Was Kicked Out of Gym For Revealing Tank Top: I Felt Humiliated
Cops Dragged Woman Off Beach After Complaint About Her Bikini
It’s one thing to say a female’s outfit or body is “too revealing”,
Teens React After Yearbook Photos Are ‘Modesty Edited’
it’s two things to photoshop out a female’s cleavage to make her look “modest” for a yearbook or a portrait!
9-Year-Old Saves Family From House Fire
But censoring a topless preteen female who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who’s around her? THAT’S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!
It’s all thanks to some videos from Inside Edition’s YouTube Channel.All these videos Inside Edition posted are developing a question in my mind that’s getting the better of me: why so much hate on the female human - even as children? Like, why do they censor the little girl’s chest? Can’t anybody learn to appreciate the appearance of the female body? Just like those parents of their own 8 year old daughter, I too am genuinely outraged by this type of treatment towards the female human!
And what’s the big deal with nipples? I’m just trying to ensure everyone is treated equally regardless of race, and gender… AND age (after what I just witnessed). And if no one’s gonna speak up about this, I might as well step up to the plate. After all, somebody’s gotta do it!
That little girl in the final video made two non-verbal messages clear: one: if a boy can do it, then so can a girl! And two: no one is too young for anything! As long as you have the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to do it properly and safely, you’ll be fine. I was able to refuel my dad’s car and cook my own dinner when I was 6 and without setting anything ablaze by accident.
However, when I try to illustrate with that video, even though Inside Edition is an official news channel, the responses I get back are rather bitter! They remove my post or ban me from the sites I post on for “promoting nudity involving a minor”!
So my big question here is:
WHERE
CAN
I
ASK
OR
SHARE
THIS
SUBJECT?!
Due to my autism, I only know basic English. So I need to illustrate to get most of my messages through. I thought hard and I tried, and low and behold, they were removed hours later mainly because they “didn’t fit the subject of the forum”. Even though my multi-subject based thread does have some material relating to this forum’s topic. These sites and mods are all really stretching my problem solving skills beyond the breaking point for this one. I’m merely protesting with these pictures and videos as illustrations. I’m not that good with words, so I need pictures to get half my messages across as noted above.
Many subreddits or forum sites don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I’m witnessing! In this case, the sentences “It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit is ‘too revealing’, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look ‘modest’ for a yearbook.” actually corresponded to several videos I bore witness to on Inside Edition’s YouTube channel.
I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won’t believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for “promoting nudity involving a minor”! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for “spam” - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).
So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I’m witnessing.
So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That’s what lead Lemmy.World mods to ban me for life for “CSAM” or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn’t. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site’s posting restrictions) is what led to this “pedophile” confusion. So please help me talk some sense into the Lemmings world, Lemmy.ml, and Lemmy.world mods that this was all a major misunderstanding and Lemmy is pretty much the only reddit alternative out here where I can try asking another question. My attempt to appeal has failed on 3 Lemmy social sites - even after I tried notifying the mods on the third Lemmy server site before making the post, so I need your help now!
I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video… I thought to myself “That’s the last straw!” Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!
Why can males show most of their body but females can’t? - In most cases that is? Whatever happened to “Free The Nipple”?
Children should have the same… rights to do things as any adult! It’s about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those “Family Day” episodes of The Price is Right and Let’s Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.
I’m not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It’s like racist people, but in age form.
Does it look like I’m laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos (I.E, “ghosting”/shadowbanning), I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out “Can’t we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?” Yeah, the last thing I need is a vein-bleeding broken-record robot impeding or hindering my ability to seek answers to a question!
We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!
Stop trying to blame it all on me! None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, Inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them. If it doesn’t violate Youtube’s TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.
No one (including the news stations from all over the globe) would answer! Not even Inside Edition themselves were willing to offer an answer when I even found their email address, the sites dedicated to helping those in mental, suicidal, or emotional distress (those forum sites even PERMA-banned me for “spam” - that’s right, SPAM! (Even though there was absolutely no mention of a permanent ban or rule about “spam” in their forum guidelines!) Is that the definition of “spam” when I make a bad thread only once?! And when I try to appeal the ban, the same message “please contact the administrator if it was done in error” is blocking my ability to click the contact button! Or sometimes it’s a blank white page with that message in the top left corner of the window! - Which adds more insult to injury, because I can’t click anything as all the buttons have disappeared! That means I can’t log out of that site either!), OR the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL let alone the entire topic itself! So I really am at a loss for thoughts and words on what I just experienced! Heck, I even tried the professional therapists of talkingforchange.ca But even they too were too reluctant to talk as they claim my post regarding the censorship of women is not for their platform and they disconnected the chat 2 seconds after their last reply to me. And I highly doubt that ANY site will allow me to illustrate with a picture of the Napalm Girl (Phan Thi Kim Phuc) when she was 9, certain pictures of Pampers diaper boxes (why do you think they (Pampers, Huggies, etc.) even allows a pic of a topless little boy or girl to be plastered on a diaper box we see in grocery stores/supermarkets everyday?), Leela when she was an infant in the episode Leela’s Homeworld, or even Belgium’s famous kids: Manneken Pis/Jeanneke Pis. Do you think she along with other nude statues from around the world are trying to promote pedos?
That, combined with YouTube having a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post comments on certain-to-random videos (I.E, “ghosting”), I’m forced to take more drastic measures to get my messages across (like those climate activists for example). All this combined, I’VE NEVER FELT SO SHUNNED FROM THE INTERNET IN ALL MY LIFE!
It seems everyone is too chicken (BAWK! BAWK-BAWK-BAWK!) to even start this subject! That’s right! You heard me clearly!
THESE
PEOPLE
ARE
PARANOID!
But here’s a strange catch: sometimes on some sites, Napalm Girl is censored, other sites she isn’t. So I felt that I need to protest this. It seems everyone is too chicken to even start this subject! Don’t these numbskulls know not to judge a book by its cover?! This is where I ask myself “NOW WHAT?!”. This can’t be one of those “exceptional” cases where they say “suicide never solves anything” doesn’t apply to these types of situations. In other words, all hope for resolving these types of situations really is lost. I really do feel left in the dark on both the subject of sound effects and nudity!
Once more, I’m not being a ped, I’m protesting all these absurd censorship rules and regulations that revolve around the female human - regardless of race and age - after what Inside Edition posted. Watch the videos I found again for clarification. In other words, the inconsistencies of FEMALE HUMAN CENSORSHIP.
Can you really - you know, hurl insults at Inside Edition, or the other news stations(s) or blast them for what they did? It was their (the news station's) idea to publicly publish the footage. Just like how that one photographer made the choice to publicly publish footage of the Napalm Girl when she was 9 and completely nude. Therefore, it should be ok for anyone to share this footage anywhere. To top that, I don't see anything in any world or site rule or law book that says "we as the viewers can't share or distribute visual content the official news reporters of the media officially published".
But some areas censored Napalm Girl’s nipples, but others did not - excluding her groin. Then there’s the diaper boxes I found in any supermarket. And finally… Surprise surprise: typical women being scolded by other people for wearing something “inappropriate” or “showing too much of their body”. I look around and since no one else is protesting about this (most likely due to YouTube’s ghosting of certain words or phrases in the users’ comments), I might as well do it! After all, someone’s gotta step up to the plate to hit that ball! I will not sit idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get treated/censored like this! I will stand up, step up, and speak out towards these absurd reactions, rules, and regulations that revolve around the appearance and censorship of the female body! Again, I never thought I would ask this, but... is... you know... standing up, taking charge, going on strike (to protest unacceptable work conditions) for a group's rights considered some kind of SIN in this case? Again, I'm just trying to do what any good activist would do: stand up for that said individual or group that's being treated wrongly!
Now please, anybody! Help me lift my Lemmy server account bans as this is all a major misunderstanding! Lemmy is the only other “backup reddit” I can find. I CAN’T TALK TO A BRICK WALL (THAT KEEPS FALLING ON ME).
The last thing any protester ever wants to encounter when trying to make a point: silence/nothing.
My protest is about I may not be a “messenger/angel (sent from) of God/The Great Beyond” or a religious member of Jesus, but people need to stop being nazis towards the female human that’s… you know… “BLESSED (UPSTAIRS)”! This is how we were created - regardless of what belief we believe in and we need to learn to appreciate the appearance of each other regardless of race… and age! In other words, people need to learn to stop body shaming the female human body - regardless of their race… AND age! I'm trying to protest "female liberation rights"! - Only to be shunned for "spam" - even though I posted on their domain only once! I'm just trying to do what any good activist would do: stand up and take charge for that said individual or group that's being treated wrongly! Ask anyone! I never thought I would ask this, but... is... you know... standing up, taking charge, going on strike (to protest unacceptable work conditions) for a group's rights considered some kind of SIN in this case?
Summary version:
It all began when I first stumbled upon Inside Edition’s videos of women - that’s WOMEN getting slammed, insulted, and blasted for “showing too much of their body”. Then it escalates further when they show a school is photoshopping out women’s cleavages to make them look “modest” for their yearbook. I feel this type of treatment towards the female human is all wrong! Like, can’t anybody learn to appreciate and look at the female body without censoring it in any way? Can’t you let ANYBODY get a chance to learn about the differences between the male and female human bodies????
THEN… and ONLY then... comes along… you guessed it. That one video Inside Edition publishes. And after seeing her top blurred, my inner voice in my head yelled out: “That’s the last straw!” Like, can’t some of us get a chance to learn something new that just aroused our curiosity? Such as how the human body changes with time in terms of both genders? Like, now, I can finally visualize myself (my whole body) from little boy to fully grown man. But when Inside Edition published that footage, the new question that took me by storm is: what would a female look like from a little girl to a fully grown woman? At least this type of footage can give me a better visual illustration - provided that Inside Edition didn’t blur it in the first place. And this will give the kids a jump start lesson on why boys and girls exist in the first place - not only because of their mental traits from toy stores, but also for a later life stage.
This is how the sequence of events played out in chronological order.
But with YouTube’s broken comment system GHOSTING certain-to-random comments, even on my backup YouTube account from my separate backup email address, I can’t seem to get ANY messages across! AKA, "shadowbanning" me.
Speaking of which, when I tried to post this on r/Feminism and r/AskFeminists, they BOTH perma-banned me for NO REASON and muted me from talking to their mods for 28 days!
Why do I say “no reason”?
"Hello, You have been permanently banned from participating in this subreddit because you/your post/action/comment broke/violated the community’s rules. You won’t be able to post or comment, but you can still view and subscribe to it.
If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team by replying to this message.
Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole."
WHAT rule(s)?! As you can see, there is no specific reason or rule listed in the message above (that was broken). So this is why I claim or what I mean by "banned from a sub for ‘no reason’. - Even for something that was never officially listed on that sub’s rule board.
Once more, I, along with these parents of their own daughter proved one major point: if a male can go topless/show their body, then so can a female - regardless of age!
Can’t I get a chance to learn something new? Some evolution/development processes for certain things can be a little more complicated than you originally first thought. Plus, I don’t recall learning about the development of the human body in terms of both genders in any of my past biology classes!
In the videos I watched, those women involved in those videos - the victims, they were doing nothing wrong! They were just minding their own business. Then, out of the blue, some random person(s) demands they “cover up” (to “protect the kids”).
When I comment “Can’t these guys learn to appreciate one’s female appearance?”, it gets ghosted by YouTube’s blasted comment moderating system. That just fuels my rage as due to that combined with getting (permanently) banned from subreddits makes me feel this world is getting more and more paranoid. I’ve never felt so shunned from the internet in all my life! I can’t seem to get any messages across at this rate!
And after that one video Inside Edition posted, I felt there might be more visual content like this out here somewhere. I just have to get lucky I find it first. Then, out of a random thought - after viewing the napalm article on Wikipedia, “Napalm Girl” was the next subject that took me by storm. And sure enough, there was the picture of her unedited - on one site, and another - from another site with her chest blurred. That got me into setting this female nudity rights protest into motion.
And while dumping some trash in a dumpster one day, I found a discarded disposable diaper box by the outside right side of the dumpster and noticed that there was a topless little girl plastered onto it. That was just the evidence I need to show everyone that the censorship regulations involving the female human body are inconsistent. That, along with nude statues - artwork of naked people.
They blast a living person, but not a statue or a disposable diaper box! - Or even something that’s news media approved!
The thing is: Inside Edition continues to upload more and more new videos about these types of incidents as each day passes! And I couldn’t see anyone else speaking out about/against this type of treatment - most likely due to the flawed YouTube comment mod system.
So seeing I’m the only one who cares for these individuals (which includes Napalm Girl (note: some images are censored while others are not)) - at this degree, I might as well do something about it - in a more drastic fashion (because of the ghosting)! (Somebody’s gotta do it!) Because like Duck (Montague) and Percy from Duck Takes Charge and Orange from Number 3 of getting out of doing one’s homework: STAND UP (TOWARDS THIS NONSENSE)! - Like going on strike due to poor work qualities/requirements. TAKE CHARGE! Don’t let this type of treatment continue! Put a stop to it somehow - one way or another!
Fellow females, for too long, you have all been body-shamed by these numbskulls who think they know everything about the female body! The time is now! Rise up, my fellow female friends! RISE UP! Viva la revolution!
Long detailed version:
Ok, before you start reading below, I want you to visit this and read the whole article to better understand my situation: CLICK HERE.
I got banned from Lemmy social site servers for “CSAM” all because of this: the Napalm Girl pic and another thing I saw on Inside Edition’s channel in addition to some nude statues - literally artwork of naked people - all because I was trying to protest the inconsistencies of censorship towards the female human - regardless of their race AND age!
Let me be clear on one thing: I didn’t post any “CSAM” on the Lemmy servers! I’m protesting something that I feel is unfair towards the female human.
Please actually watch these before jumping to conclusions so you can actually understand what I’m really protesting!
Women Who Were Told Their Outfits Were ‘Too Revealing’
Mom Says She Was Kicked Out of Gym For Revealing Tank Top: I Felt Humiliated
Cops Dragged Woman Off Beach After Complaint About Her Bikini
It’s one thing to say a female’s outfit or body is “too revealing”,
Teens React After Yearbook Photos Are ‘Modesty Edited’
it’s two things to photoshop out a female’s cleavage to make her look “modest” for a yearbook or a portrait!
9-Year-Old Saves Family From House Fire
But censoring a topless preteen female who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who’s around her? THAT’S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!
It’s all thanks to some videos from Inside Edition’s YouTube Channel.All these videos Inside Edition posted are developing a question in my mind that’s getting the better of me: why so much hate on the female human - even as children? Like, why do they censor the little girl’s chest? Can’t anybody learn to appreciate the appearance of the female body? Just like those parents of their own 8 year old daughter, I too am genuinely outraged by this type of treatment towards the female human!
And what’s the big deal with nipples? I’m just trying to ensure everyone is treated equally regardless of race, and gender… AND age (after what I just witnessed). And if no one’s gonna speak up about this, I might as well step up to the plate. After all, somebody’s gotta do it!
That little girl in the final video made two non-verbal messages clear: one: if a boy can do it, then so can a girl! And two: no one is too young for anything! As long as you have the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to do it properly and safely, you’ll be fine. I was able to refuel my dad’s car and cook my own dinner when I was 6 and without setting anything ablaze by accident.
However, when I try to illustrate with that video, even though Inside Edition is an official news channel, the responses I get back are rather bitter! They remove my post or ban me from the sites I post on for “promoting nudity involving a minor”!
So my big question here is:
WHERE
CAN
I
ASK
OR
SHARE
THIS
SUBJECT?!
Due to my autism, I only know basic English. So I need to illustrate to get most of my messages through. I thought hard and I tried, and low and behold, they were removed hours later mainly because they “didn’t fit the subject of the forum”. Even though my multi-subject based thread does have some material relating to this forum’s topic. These sites and mods are all really stretching my problem solving skills beyond the breaking point for this one. I’m merely protesting with these pictures and videos as illustrations. I’m not that good with words, so I need pictures to get half my messages across as noted above.
Many subreddits or forum sites don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I’m witnessing! In this case, the sentences “It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit is ‘too revealing’, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look ‘modest’ for a yearbook.” actually corresponded to several videos I bore witness to on Inside Edition’s YouTube channel.
I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won’t believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for “promoting nudity involving a minor”! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for “spam” - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).
So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I’m witnessing.
So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That’s what lead Lemmy.World mods to ban me for life for “CSAM” or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn’t. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site’s posting restrictions) is what led to this “pedophile” confusion. So please help me talk some sense into the Lemmings world, Lemmy.ml, and Lemmy.world mods that this was all a major misunderstanding and Lemmy is pretty much the only reddit alternative out here where I can try asking another question. My attempt to appeal has failed on 3 Lemmy social sites - even after I tried notifying the mods on the third Lemmy server site before making the post, so I need your help now!
I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video… I thought to myself “That’s the last straw!” Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!
Why can males show most of their body but females can’t? - In most cases that is? Whatever happened to “Free The Nipple”?
Children should have the same… rights to do things as any adult! It’s about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those “Family Day” episodes of The Price is Right and Let’s Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.
I’m not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It’s like racist people, but in age form.
Does it look like I’m laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos (I.E, “ghosting”/shadowbanning), I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out “Can’t we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?” Yeah, the last thing I need is a vein-bleeding broken-record robot impeding or hindering my ability to seek answers to a question!
We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!
Stop trying to blame it all on me! None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, Inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them. If it doesn’t violate Youtube’s TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.
No one (including the news stations from all over the globe) would answer! Not even Inside Edition themselves were willing to offer an answer when I even found their email address, the sites dedicated to helping those in mental, suicidal, or emotional distress (those forum sites even PERMA-banned me for “spam” - that’s right, SPAM! (Even though there was absolutely no mention of a permanent ban or rule about “spam” in their forum guidelines!) Is that the definition of “spam” when I make a bad thread only once?! And when I try to appeal the ban, the same message “please contact the administrator if it was done in error” is blocking my ability to click the contact button! Or sometimes it’s a blank white page with that message in the top left corner of the window! - Which adds more insult to injury, because I can’t click anything as all the buttons have disappeared! That means I can’t log out of that site either!), OR the adult video forums that support uncensored nudity images would accept that video link URL let alone the entire topic itself! So I really am at a loss for thoughts and words on what I just experienced! Heck, I even tried the professional therapists of talkingforchange.ca But even they too were too reluctant to talk as they claim my post regarding the censorship of women is not for their platform and they disconnected the chat 2 seconds after their last reply to me. And I highly doubt that ANY site will allow me to illustrate with a picture of the Napalm Girl (Phan Thi Kim Phuc) when she was 9, certain pictures of Pampers diaper boxes (why do you think they (Pampers, Huggies, etc.) even allows a pic of a topless little boy or girl to be plastered on a diaper box we see in grocery stores/supermarkets everyday?), Leela when she was an infant in the episode Leela’s Homeworld, or even Belgium’s famous kids: Manneken Pis/Jeanneke Pis. Do you think she along with other nude statues from around the world are trying to promote pedos?
That, combined with YouTube having a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post comments on certain-to-random videos (I.E, “ghosting”), I’m forced to take more drastic measures to get my messages across (like those climate activists for example). All this combined, I’VE NEVER FELT SO SHUNNED FROM THE INTERNET IN ALL MY LIFE!
It seems everyone is too chicken (BAWK! BAWK-BAWK-BAWK!) to even start this subject! That’s right! You heard me clearly!
THESE
PEOPLE
ARE
PARANOID!
But here’s a strange catch: sometimes on some sites, Napalm Girl is censored, other sites she isn’t. So I felt that I need to protest this. It seems everyone is too chicken to even start this subject! Don’t these numbskulls know not to judge a book by its cover?! This is where I ask myself “NOW WHAT?!”. This can’t be one of those “exceptional” cases where they say “suicide never solves anything” doesn’t apply to these types of situations. In other words, all hope for resolving these types of situations really is lost. I really do feel left in the dark on both the subject of sound effects and nudity!
Once more, I’m not being a ped, I’m protesting all these absurd censorship rules and regulations that revolve around the female human - regardless of race and age - after what Inside Edition posted. Watch the videos I found again for clarification. In other words, the inconsistencies of FEMALE HUMAN CENSORSHIP.
Can you really - you know, hurl insults at Inside Edition, or the other news stations(s) or blast them for what they did? It was their (the news station's) idea to publicly publish the footage. Just like how that one photographer made the choice to publicly publish footage of the Napalm Girl when she was 9 and completely nude. Therefore, it should be ok for anyone to share this footage anywhere. To top that, I don't see anything in any world or site rule or law book that says "we as the viewers can't share or distribute visual content the official news reporters of the media officially published".
But some areas censored Napalm Girl’s nipples, but others did not - excluding her groin. Then there’s the diaper boxes I found in any supermarket. And finally… Surprise surprise: typical women being scolded by other people for wearing something “inappropriate” or “showing too much of their body”. I look around and since no one else is protesting about this (most likely due to YouTube’s ghosting of certain words or phrases in the users’ comments), I might as well do it! After all, someone’s gotta step up to the plate to hit that ball! I will not sit idling by the sidelines and continue to watch the female human get treated/censored like this! I will stand up, step up, and speak out towards these absurd reactions, rules, and regulations that revolve around the appearance and censorship of the female body! Again, I never thought I would ask this, but... is... you know... standing up, taking charge, going on strike (to protest unacceptable work conditions) for a group's rights considered some kind of SIN in this case? Again, I'm just trying to do what any good activist would do: stand up for that said individual or group that's being treated wrongly!
Now please, anybody! Help me lift my Lemmy server account bans as this is all a major misunderstanding! Lemmy is the only other “backup reddit” I can find. I CAN’T TALK TO A BRICK WALL (THAT KEEPS FALLING ON ME).
The last thing any protester ever wants to encounter when trying to make a point: silence/nothing.