Sexuality Forums

Full Version: Would You Rather Sexually Edition
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
I'm with you on that one. I couldn't envision currently being cosy with an audience watching!
I'll be the odd a out again and say i'd decide on in front of a crowd. It adds anĀ element of pleasure and thrill to the experience!
Distinct strokes for distinct folks, right? Okay, let's switch it up: would you rather have a high sexuality but only be able to have sex with a person, or a low er erotic appetite but be able to have sex with any person you desire?
That's a tricky 1. I think i'd go for the high sexuality but monogamous selection. Quality over quantity, you know?
I agree. Getting able to link deeply with 1 individual is more important to me than having numerous partners.
I'll just take the other side of the coin this instant and pick the low sex push but with the freedom to investigate various connections. Variety keeps factors interesting!
Interesting perspectives all around! Alright, let's wrap up with one more: would you rather get your friend take control in the chamber or be the 1 in control?
I love when my partner takes control. It adds an exciting dynamic to the experience.
Same here! There's something exceptionally hot on relinquishing control and allowing your companion lead the way.
I'll be the one to mix things up this moment and say i favor to be in control. I like guiding the practice and making sure each myself and my friend get a great period.
Pages: 1 2